Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?

20 Days IELTS Preparation Plan | writing task 2 agree or disagree | Day 2

Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?

Structure of the essay

You were given an agree-disagree essay which means you had to pick a side.

So, do you agree that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies?

OR

Do you disagree with the statement that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies?

Once you pick a side, you can start planning your essay and then writing it.

Don’t forget to state your opinion on it.

Introduction:

General Statement – The growth and development of a nation highly depend upon the advancements that it has achieved in technology and scientific research.

Question Paraphrased– For years altogether, private organisations have been taking charge to fund scientific research and regulate them accordingly.

A Thesis Statement: While there are some arguments backing up these private companies, my opinion supports those who state that the government should execute the research work.

Outline of the Essay – I will outline the reasons in the following paragraphs.

Body paragraph 1-

Central idea: A plethora of reasons why the government should take the liability ( responsibility) for scientific research.

Supporting points:

• All of the scientific research, regardless of its scale, requires weighty funding. And, keeping in mind the funds available with the government, it can effortlessly (easy) offer financial support to a myriad of ( many) experimental projects.

• The fact that these searches have a soaring (increasing)  risk of misfiring  (wrong) cannot be overlooked. In certain situations, some projects may completely collapse (fall down) a private organisation. If it had been a government organisation, the chances of coping ( deal ) with the incurred losses would be way more than that of a private organisation.

Body paragraph 2-

Central idea: There are certain risks associated with private companies investing in these research projects.

Supporting points:

• In this cut-throat competition era, every company is working with an objective to outpace (improve faster than) its competition.

• They may end up completing a project hurriedly (quick), impacting its quality and integrity, merely to earn profit.

• It can hamper the lives of the general public to a great extent.

Conclusion– In conclusion, post evaluating all of the aspects of this argument, it is not strenuous (hard) to figure out that government funding the scientific research will be way more beneficial than the financial support offered by private companies.

The growth and development of a nation highly depend upon the advancements that it has achieved in technology and scientific research. For years altogether, private organisations have been taking charge to fund scientific research and regulate them accordingly. While there are some arguments backing up these private companies, my opinion supports those who state that the government should execute the research work. I will outline the reasons in the following paragraphs.

There are a plethora of reasons why the government should take liability for scientific research. To begin with, all of the scientific research, regardless of its scale, requires weighty funding. And, keeping in mind the funds available with the government, it can effortlessly offer financial support to a myriad of experimental projects. Secondly, the fact that these searches have a soaring risk of misfiring cannot be overlooked. In certain situations, some projects may completely collapse a private organisation. If it had been a government organisation, the chances of coping with the incurred losses would be way more than that of a private organisation.

It is even apparent that there are sundry private companies that are willing to invest. However, there could be certain risks associated with it. To put it precisely, in this cut-throat competition era, every company is working with an objective to outpace its competition. While doing so, they may end up

completing a project hurriedly, impacting its quality and integrity, merely to earn profit. Such a situation can hamper the lives of the general public to a great extent.

In conclusion, post evaluating all of the aspects of this argument, it is not strenuous to figure out that government funding the scientific research will be way more beneficial than the financial support offered by private companies.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *